Imagine a platform for compliance costing $12,000 annually. Does that sound like a high price?
The answer is dependent on what it is replacing.
If the automation process eliminates hundreds of hours repetitive evidence gathering in a complex technology system, $12,000 might be well-spent. If a seven person startup could have the same information in the space of a few hours every month, the cost will be different.
It’s a great way to start your search for Vanta. Do not begin with asking which platform has the most features. Find out how much time and effort these features can save your business.
Automation has an economic break-even The Key
Automation of compliance isn’t intrinsically beneficial or harmful. Scale can alter its value. Imagine an expanding technology company that has multiple cloud environments and numerous applications. The burden of manually collecting evidence continuously could become very high. Integrations which automatically monitor systems and gather evidence could easily justify their expense.
Imagine a company of 10 people preparing to undergo its first SOC 2 audit. It may have a relatively small infrastructure, and collection of evidence could be handled with minimal automation.
Vanta pricing is based on this variation. The capabilities of a modern platform are impressive, but they only provide financial value when an organization needs them.
Compare Architecture and Not Just Brands
A search for Vanta vs Drata can quickly become a feature-by-feature exercise. It is essential to look at the services, features, contracts and quotes of each platform. Both are well-established compliance platforms that focus on automation and integrations.
It’s important to choose something else first. Do you want a software that can be integrated into your compliance system? Certain companies want automated evidence collection as well as continuous monitoring. Some companies prefer to collect evidence themselves.
Vanta Competitors do not follow the exact same guidelines.
A number of well-known Vanta competitors compete in a similar automation-focused category. It also offers smaller platforms based on organization rather than extensive system connectivity.
CertAssist belongs to the latter category. CertAssist, created by internal auditors, compliance consultants, as well as other experts, is a system for organizing controls frameworks in a central workspace. It allows for the editing of policies and guidance for evidence, and allows auditors to look over evidence using read-only access.
It doesn’t install agents or connect to infrastructure systems. Customers upload their own proof.
The system access should be considered. the system access.
The elimination of integrations comes with its disadvantages: someone must manually collect evidence.
This removes the requirement for integration, and the use of compliance doesn’t require a connection to the operational environment.
Both of these architectures are equally great. What is the best choice for your company?
CertAssist is aimed at teams of between five and 200 members and announces its prices rather than needing for a sales meeting to get the initial figure. The initial price listed for CertAssist per month is $225, as opposed to the usual $375.
Let Complexity Take Its Rightful Place
Today’s needs for a startup with 10 employees are not necessarily similar to the needs of an organization with 100 or 500 workers.
A simple platform could make sense, while compliance is straightforward. Automation’s cost-effectiveness can be increased as systems, employees and frameworks grow. That’s a healthier way to purchase compliance technology to let complexity earn its place.
Don’t buy fifty different integrations because they look attractive on the comparison chart. You should pay for them only if the manual task they replace is the most expensive option.